Farming is a public service

More distinct terms are commonly used to denote farmers who raise specific domesticated animals. For example, those who raise grazing livestock, such as cattle, sheep, goats and horses, are known as ranchers (U.S.), graziers (Australia & UK) or simply stockmen. Sheep, goat and cattle farmers might also be referred to, respectively, as shepherds, goatherds and cowherds. The term dairy farmer is applied to those engaged primarily in milk production, whether from cattle, goats, sheep, or other milk producing animals. A poultry farmer is one who concentrates on raising chickens, turkeys, ducks or geese, for either meat, egg or feather production, or commonly, all three. A person who raises a variety of vegetables for market may be called a truck farmer or market gardener. Dirt farmer is an American colloquial term for a practical farmer, or one who farms his own land.[10]

'Farming is a public service' shirt

In developed nations, a farmer (as a profession) is usually defined as someone with an ownership interest in crops or livestock, and who provides land or management in their production. Those who provide only labor are most often called farmhands. Alternatively, growers who manage farmland for an absentee landowner, sharing the harvest (or its profits) are known as sharecroppers or sharefarmers. In the context of agribusiness, a farmer is defined broadly, and thus many individuals not necessarily engaged in full-time farming can nonetheless legally qualify under agricultural policy for various subsidies, incentives, and tax deductions.

A farmer in Nicaragua

Techniques

In the context of developing nations or other pre-industrial cultures, most farmers practice a meager subsistence agriculture—a simple organic-farming system employing crop rotation, seed saving, slash and burn, or other techniques to maximize efficiency while meeting the needs of the household or community. One subsisting in this way may become labelled as a peasant, often associated disparagingly with a "peasant mentality".[11]

Tanzanian tea farmers

In developed nations, however, a person using such techniques on small patches of land might be called a gardener and be considered a hobbyist. Alternatively, one might be driven into such practices by poverty or, ironically—against the background of large-scale agribusiness—might become an organic farmer growing for discerning/faddish consumers in the local food market.

Farming organizations

psprfarmshop102 psprfarmshop103 psprfarmshop104 psprfarmshop105 psprfarmshop106 psprfarmshop107 psprfarmshop108 psprfarmshop109 psprfarmshop110 psprfarmshop111 psprfarmshop112 psprfarmshop113 psprfarmshop114 psprfarmshop115 psprfarmshop116 psprfarmshop117 psprfarmshop118 psprfarmshop119 psprfarmshop120 psprfarmshop121 psprfarmshop122 psprfarmshop123 psprfarmshop124 psprfarmshop125 psprfarmshop126 psprfarmshop127 psprfarmshop128 psprfarmshop129 psprfarmshop130 psprfarmshop131 psprfarmshop132 psprfarmshop133 psprfarmshop134 psprfarmshop135 psprfarmshop136 psprfarmshop137 psprfarmshop138 psprfarmshop139 psprfarmshop140 psprfarmshop141

Cooperatives as a form of business organization are distinct from the more common investor-owned firms (IOFs).[1][4] Both are organized as corporations, but IOFs pursue profit maximization objectives, whereas cooperatives strive to maximize the benefits they generate for their members (which usually involves zero-profit operation). Agricultural cooperatives are therefore created in situations where farmers cannot obtain essential services from IOFs (because the provision of these services is judged to be unprofitable by the IOFs), or when IOFs provide the services at disadvantageous terms to the farmers (i.e., the services are available, but the profit-motivated prices are too high for the farmers). The former situations are characterized in economic theory as market failure or missing services motive. The latter drive the creation of cooperatives as a competitive yardstick or as a means of allowing farmers to build countervailing market power to oppose the IOFs.[1] The concept of competitive yardstick implies that farmers, faced with an unsatisfactory performance by IOFs, may form a cooperative firm whose purpose is to force the IOFs, through competition, to improve their service to farmers.[4]

psprfarmshop142 psprfarmshop143 psprfarmshop144 psprfarmshop145 psprfarmshop146 psprfarmshop147 psprfarmshop148 psprfarmshop149 psprfarmshop150 psprfarmshop151 psprfarmshop152 psprfarmshop153 psprfarmshop154 psprfarmshop155 psprfarmshop156 psprfarmshop157 psprfarmshop158 psprfarmshop159 psprfarmshop160 psprfarmshop161 psprfarmshop162 psprfarmshop163 psprfarmshop164 psprfarmshop165 psprfarmshop166 psprfarmshop167 psprfarmshop168 psprfarmshop169 psprfarmshop170 psprfarmshop171 psprfarmshop172 psprfarmshop173 psprfarmshop174 psprfarmshop175 psprfarmshop176 psprfarmshop177 psprfarmshop178 psprfarmshop179 psprfarmshop180 psprfarmshop181 psprfarmshop182 psprfarmshop183 psprfarmshop184 psprfarmshop185 psprfarmshop186 psprfarmshop187 psprfarmshop188 psprfarmshop189 psprfarmshop190 psprfarmshop191 psprfarmshop192 psprfarmshop193

Headquarters of Hokuren Federation of Agricultural Cooperatives in Sapporo, Japan

A practical motivation for the creation of agricultural cooperatives is related to the ability of farmers to pool production and/or resources. In many situations within agriculture, it is simply too expensive for farmers to manufacture products or undertake a service. Cooperatives provide a method for farmers to join in an 'association', through which a group of farmers can acquire a better outcome, typically financial, than by going alone. This approach is aligned to the concept of economies of scale and can also be related as a form of economic synergy, where "two or more agents working together to produce a result not obtainable by any of the agents independently". While it may seem reasonable to conclude that the larger the cooperative the better, this is not necessarily true. Cooperatives exist across a broad membership base, with some cooperatives having fewer than 20 members while others can have over 10,000.